When a psychometric advance falls in the forest

DOI10.1007/S11336-006-1500-5MaRDI QIDQ2260968zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Lee Anna Clark

Publication date 6 March 2015

Published in Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Full work available at URL http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2779409

zbMATH Keywords

psychometricspsychological measurementconstruct validitycritique

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Recommendations

• The attack of the psychometricians
• The use and misuse of psychometric models
• Can we bring about a velvet revolution in psychological measurement? A rejoinder to commentaries
• Departure from normal assumptions: A promise for future psychometrics with substantive mathematical modeling
• Psychometric methods. Theory into practice
• Visions of 70 years of psychometrics: the past, present, and future
• Seeking a balance between the statistical and scientific elements in psychometrics
• Psychometrics in psychological research: role model or partner in science?

Cites work

• The attack of the psychometricians

Cited in

(7)

• The attack of the psychometricians
• Psychometrics in psychological research: role model or partner in science?
• Commentaries on the ten most highly cited Psychometrika articles from 1936 to the present
• Possible futures for network psychometrics
• Can we bring about a velvet revolution in psychological measurement? A rejoinder to commentaries
• Future of psychometrics: Ask what psychometrics can do for psychology
• Invariance in measurement and prediction revisited

This page was built for publication: When a psychometric advance falls in the forest

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2260968)