An empirical evaluation of the approximation of subjective logic operators using Monte Carlo simulations

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2283288

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2019.05.005zbMATH Open1460.68104arXiv1808.05884OpenAlexW2887582194MaRDI QIDQ2283288FDOQ2283288


Authors: Fabio M. Zennaro, Magdalena Ivanovska, Audun Jøsang Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 December 2019

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper we analyze the use of subjective logic as a framework for performing approximate transformations over probability distribution functions. As for any approximation, we evaluate subjective logic in terms of computational efficiency and bias. However, while the computational cost may be easily estimated, the bias of subjective logic operators have not yet been investigated. In order to evaluate this bias, we propose an experimental protocol that exploits Monte Carlo simulations and their properties to assess the distance between the result produced by subjective logic operators and the true result of the corresponding transformation over probability distributions. This protocol allows a modeler to get an estimate of the degree of approximation she must be ready to accept as a trade-off for the computational efficiency and the interpretability of the subjective logic framework. Concretely, we apply our method to the relevant case study of the subjective logic operator for binomial multiplication and fusion, and we study empirically their degree of approximation.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05884




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: An empirical evaluation of the approximation of subjective logic operators using Monte Carlo simulations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2283288)