Contribution to attributive and object subcontexts in inferring good maximally redundant tests
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2286403
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1670906 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4016967 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1808289 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4201691 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3823743 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3481857 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1249514 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2168560 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2101414 (Why is no real title available?)
- A fast incremental algorithm for building lattices
- A lattice-free concept lattice update algorithm
- An incremental algorithm to construct a lattice of set intersections
- Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattices
- Comparison of data structures for computing formal concepts
- Concept Lattices
- Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication
- Data mining and knowledge discovery approaches based on rule induction techniques.
- Fast algorithm for computing fixpoints of Galois connections induced by object-attribute relational data
- Formal concept analysis and information retrieval -- a survey
- Fuzzy and rough formal concept analysis: a survey
- Good classification tests as formal concepts
- Hypotheses and version spaces
- Mathematical aspects of concept analysis
- The learnability of description logics with equality constraints
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Contribution to attributive and object subcontexts in inferring good maximally redundant tests
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2286403)