About the measure of the bare cosmological constant
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2286544
Abstract: I try to revive, and possibly reconcile, a debate started a few years ago, about the relative roles of a bare cosmological constant and of a vacuum energy, by taking the attitude to try to get the most from the physics now available as established. I notice that the bare cosmological constant of the Einstein equations, which is there ever since GR emerged, is actually constrained (if not measured) indirectly from the effective cosmological constant observed now, as given by Precision Cosmology and from the cumulative vacuum contribution of Standard Model particles, when this is evaluated using the well-established physics of Quantum Field Theory. Therefore the fine tuning, implied by the compensation to a small positive value of the two large contributions, could be seen as offered by Nature, which provides one more fundamental constant, the bare Lambda. The possibility is then discussed of constraining (measuring) directly such a bare cosmological constant by the features of primordial gravitational wave signals. A hint is briefly discussed for a possible bare Lambda inflation process.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Casimir effects are not an experimental demonstration that free vacuum gravitates: connections to the cosmological constant problem
- Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves
- Hořava gravity at a Lifshitz point: a progress report
- Late-time acceleration by a residual cosmological constant from sequestering vacuum energy in ultimate collapsed structures
This page was built for publication: About the measure of the bare cosmological constant
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2286544)