Metafrontier productivity indices: questioning the common convexification strategy

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2019.11.019MaRDI QIDQ2286992zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Qianying Jin, Kristiaan Kerstens, Ignace Van de Woestyne

Publication date 23 January 2020

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.019

zbMATH Keywords

data envelopment analysismetafrontierMalmquistHicks-Moorsteen

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82) Production theory, theory of the firm (91B38)

Recommendations

• Metatechnology frontier and convexity: a restatement
• A linear programming approach to efficiency evaluation in nonconvex metatechnologies
• Productivity change of Taiwanese farmers' credit unions: a nonparametric metafrontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity indicator
• Metafrontier efficiency analysis with convex and non-convex metatechnologies by stochastic nonparametric envelopment of data
• Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2114369 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 975527 (Why is no real title available?)
• A linear programming approach to efficiency evaluation in nonconvex metatechnologies
• A non-convex meta-frontier Malmquist index for measuring productivity over time
• A nonparametric test for equality of distributions with mixed categorical and continuous data
• Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes allowing for reallocation of resources
• Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995--2015
• Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data
• Decomposing productivity indexes into explanatory factors
• Efficiency decompositions for heterogeneous technologies
• Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices
• Infeasibility and directional distance functions with application to the determinateness of the Luenberger productivity indicator
• Metatechnology frontier and convexity: a restatement
• Nonparametric testing of closeness between two unknown distribution functions
• On Testing Equality of Distributions of Technical Efficiency Scores
• On goodness-of-fit tests for weakly dependent processes using kernel method
• On two definitions of productivity
• The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity
• The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time
• Using information about technologies, markets and firm behaviour to decompose a proper productivity index

Cited in

(10)

• Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995--2015
• Aggregation of meta-technology ratio in DEA framework using the evidential reasoning approach
• A sequential benefit-of-the-doubt composite indicator
• Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data
• Dynamic firm performance and estimator choice: a comparison of dynamic panel data estimators
• Evaluating different groups of mutual funds using a metafrontier approach: ethical vs. non-ethical funds
• Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management
• Technology heterogeneity and sustainability efficiency: empirical evidence from Peruvian coffee production
• Meta-frontier and technology switchers: a nonparametric approach
• Metatechnology frontier and convexity: a restatement

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• DEA

This page was built for publication: Metafrontier productivity indices: questioning the common convexification strategy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2286992)