Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2287192
DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2019.103198zbMATH Open1478.68358OpenAlexW2984188492MaRDI QIDQ2287192FDOQ2287192
Authors: Jörg Pührer 
Publication date: 20 January 2020
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.103198
Recommendations
- On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks
- Expressiveness of two-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1046390
- Maximal and premaximal paraconsistency in the framework of three-valued semantics
- Three-valued logics in modal logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1163566
- A three-valued semantics for logic programmers
- The intricacies of three-valued extensional semantics for higher-order logic programs
- Three-valued nonmonotonic formalisms and semantics of logic programs
- A three-valued semantics for deductive databases and logic programs
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: the hidden power of argumentation semantics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- Approximations, stable operators, well-founded fixpoints and applications in nonmonotonic reasoning
- On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics
- Computational models of argument (COMMA 2010). Proceedings of 3rd conference, Desanzano del Garda, Italy, September 2010.
- The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Expressiveness of two-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures
- Understanding the abstract dialectical framework
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches
- Model-based recasting in answer-set programming
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Intertranslatability of labeling-based argumentation semantics
Cited In (10)
- Three-valued semantic pluralism: a defense of a three-valued solution to the \textit{sorites} paradox
- Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Expressiveness of SETAFs and support-free ADFs under 3-valued semantics
- A Classical Realizability Model for a Semantical Value Restriction
- A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks
- Revision, defeasible conditionals and non-monotonic inference for abstract dialectical frameworks
- On the preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: bijections with naive sets
- Expressiveness of two-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2287192)
