Conflict-driven satisfiability for theory combination: transition system and completeness
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2303254
DOI10.1007/s10817-018-09510-yzbMath1468.68194OpenAlexW2907207368MaRDI QIDQ2303254
Natarajan Shankar, Maria Paola Bonacina, Stéphane Graham-Lengrand
Publication date: 3 March 2020
Published in: Journal of Automated Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-018-09510-y
Logic in computer science (03B70) Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20)
Related Items (6)
Conflict-driven satisfiability for theory combination: lemmas, modules, and proofs ⋮ The ksmt calculus is a \(\delta \)-complete decision procedure for non-linear constraints ⋮ Semantically-guided goal-sensitive reasoning: decision procedures and the Koala prover ⋮ The \texttt{ksmt} calculus is a \(\delta \)-complete decision procedure for non-linear constraints ⋮ Solving bitvectors with MCSAT: explanations from bits and pieces ⋮ SGGS decision procedures
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Satisfiability modulo theories and assignments
- Deciding Bit-Vector Formulas with mcSAT
- Solving Non-linear Arithmetic
- A Model-Constructing Satisfiability Calculus
- Solving Nonlinear Integer Arithmetic with MCSAT
- Sharing Is Caring: Combination of Theories
- Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories
- Architecting Solvers for SAT Modulo Theories: Nelson-Oppen with DPLL
- Simplification by Cooperating Decision Procedures
- Cutting to the Chase Solving Linear Integer Arithmetic
- Splitting on Demand in SAT Modulo Theories
This page was built for publication: Conflict-driven satisfiability for theory combination: transition system and completeness