Normal numbers are not fat for doubling measures

DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2019.07.025zbMATH Open1423.28025OpenAlexW2959819830MaRDI QIDQ2320164FDOQ2320164

Authors: Fengji Peng, Shengyou Wen 

Publication date: 21 August 2019

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.07.025

Recommendations

• The measure of non-normal sets
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4196077
• Measures of sets decomposing the simply normal numbers in the unit interval
• Normal numbers from infinite convolution measures
• scientific article

zbMATH Keywords

normal numbersdoubling measuresfat sets

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fractals (28A80)

Cites Work

• Hausdorff dimension and quasisymmetric mappings.
• Thin and fat sets for doubling measures in metric spaces
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Doubling for general sets
• Fatness and thinness of uniform Cantor sets for doubling measures
• Note on atomic doubling measures, quasisymmetrically thin sets and thick sets
• A doubling measure on \(\mathbb {R}^d\) can charge a rectifiable curve
• Fat and thin sets for doubling measures in Euclidean space
• Some geometric properties of sets defined by digit restrictions
• A function whose graph has positive doubling measure
• On thin carpets for doubling measures

This page was built for publication: Normal numbers are not fat for doubling measures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2320164)