Normal numbers are not fat for doubling measures

DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2019.07.025MaRDI QIDQ2320164zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Fengji Peng, Shengyou Wen

Publication date 21 August 2019

Published in Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.07.025

zbMATH Keywords

normal numbersdoubling measuresfat sets

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fractals (28A80)

Recommendations

• The measure of non-normal sets
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4196077
• Measures of sets decomposing the simply normal numbers in the unit interval
• Normal numbers from infinite convolution measures
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3873440

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 469027 (Why is no real title available?)
• A doubling measure on \(\mathbb {R}^d\) can charge a rectifiable curve
• A function whose graph has positive doubling measure
• Doubling for general sets
• Fat and thin sets for doubling measures in Euclidean space
• Fatness and thinness of uniform Cantor sets for doubling measures
• Hausdorff dimension and quasisymmetric mappings.
• Note on atomic doubling measures, quasisymmetrically thin sets and thick sets
• On thin carpets for doubling measures
• Some geometric properties of sets defined by digit restrictions
• Thin and fat sets for doubling measures in metric spaces

This page was built for publication: Normal numbers are not fat for doubling measures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2320164)