Cake-cutting with different entitlements: how many cuts are needed?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2325916
Abstract: A cake has to be divided fairly among agents. When all agents have equal entitlements, it is known that such a division can be implemented with cuts. When agents may have different entitlements, the paper shows that at least cuts may be necessary, and cuts are always sufficient.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Divide-and-Conquer: A Proportional, Minimal-Envy Cake-Cutting Algorithm
- Economics and computation. An introduction to algorithmic game theory, computational social choice, and fair division
- Extensions of cut-and-choose fair division
- Game-theoretic algorithms for fair and strongly fair cake division with entitlements
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1234106 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1015852 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5240213 (Why is no real title available?)
- Ramsey partitions of integers and fair divisions
- Sets on which several measures agree
Cited in
(12)- Picking sequences and monotonicity in weighted fair division
- Mind the gap: cake cutting with separation
- Fair cake-cutting among families
- How to divide a cake when people have different metabolism?
- Fair multi-cake cutting
- Efficient Fair Division with Minimal Sharing
- Disproportionate division
- Keep your distance: land division with separation
- Weighted fair division of indivisible items: a review
- Asymptotic analysis of weighted fair division
- Fairer than fair: sharp bounds for connected super-proportional cake cutting
- Fair division is hard even for amicable agents
This page was built for publication: Cake-cutting with different entitlements: how many cuts are needed?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2325916)