Cake-cutting with different entitlements: how many cuts are needed?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2325916
DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2019.123382zbMATH Open1426.91149arXiv1803.05470OpenAlexW2789960275WikidataQ127406512 ScholiaQ127406512MaRDI QIDQ2325916FDOQ2325916
Authors: Erel Segal-Halevi
Publication date: 4 October 2019
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: A cake has to be divided fairly among agents. When all agents have equal entitlements, it is known that such a division can be implemented with cuts. When agents may have different entitlements, the paper shows that at least cuts may be necessary, and cuts are always sufficient.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05470
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Economics and computation. An introduction to algorithmic game theory, computational social choice, and fair division
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Divide-and-Conquer: A Proportional, Minimal-Envy Cake-Cutting Algorithm
- Sets on which several measures agree
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ramsey partitions of integers and fair divisions
- Extensions of cut-and-choose fair division
- Game-theoretic algorithms for fair and strongly fair cake division with entitlements
Cited In (10)
- Fair cake-cutting among families
- Fair division is hard even for amicable agents
- Fair multi-cake cutting
- Efficient Fair Division with Minimal Sharing
- Disproportionate division
- Weighted fair division of indivisible items: a review
- Picking sequences and monotonicity in weighted fair division
- Keep your distance: land division with separation
- How to divide a cake when people have different metabolism?
- Mind the gap: cake cutting with separation
This page was built for publication: Cake-cutting with different entitlements: how many cuts are needed?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2325916)