Further results on size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests, with an application to trend testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2326985
Abstract: We complement the theory developed in Preinerstorfer and P"otscher (2016) with further finite sample results on size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests. These allows us, in particular, to show that the sufficient conditions for the existence of size-controlling critical values recently obtained in P"otscher and Preinerstorfer (2018) are often also necessary. We furthermore apply the results obtained to tests for hypotheses on deterministic trends in stationary time series regressions, and find that many tests currently used are strongly size-distorted.
Recommendations
- On size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests
- A NEW ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST TESTS
- The robustness, reliabiligy and power of heteroskedasticity tests
- HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST TESTING USING BANDWIDTH EQUAL TO SAMPLE SIZE
- Power maximization and size control in heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests with exponentiated kernels
- A heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust \(F\) test using an orthonormal series variance estimator
- Heteroskedasticity–robust tests with minimum size distortion
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3346000 (Why is no real title available?)
- A NEW ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST TESTS
- A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix
- A simple, robust and powerful test of the trend hypothesis
- Algorithm AS 155: The Distribution of a Linear Combination of χ 2 Random Variables
- An Improved Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator
- Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation
- Conditional properties of statistical procedures
- Controlling the size of autocorrelation robust tests
- Estimating deterministic trends with an integrated or stationary noise component
- Finite sample properties of tests based on prewhitened nonparametric covariance estimators
- HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST TESTING USING BANDWIDTH EQUAL TO SAMPLE SIZE
- Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation
- Heteroskedasticity-Autocorrelation Robust Standard Errors Using The Bartlett Kernel Without Truncation
- On size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests
- On the Estimation of Regression Coefficients in the Case of an Autocorrelated Disturbance
- Simple Robust Testing of Regression Hypotheses
- Trend Function Hypothesis Testing in the Presence of Serial Correlation
Cited in
(9)- HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST TESTING USING BANDWIDTH EQUAL TO SAMPLE SIZE
- Controlling the size of autocorrelation robust tests
- Testing-optimal kernel choice in HAR inference
- Simultaneous bandwidths determination for DK-HAC estimators and long-run variance estimation in nonparametric settings
- On size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests
- Power maximization and size control in heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests with exponentiated kernels
- Optimal HAR inference
- How Reliable are Bootstrap-based Heteroskedasticity Robust Tests?
- Finite-sample corrected inference for two-step GMM in time series
This page was built for publication: Further results on size and power of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust tests, with an application to trend testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2326985)
