Quantum contextuality implies a logic that does not obey the principle of bivalence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2329952
Abstract: In the paper, a value assignment for projection operators relating to a quantum system is equated with assignment of truth-values to the propositions associated with these operators. In consequence, the Kochen-Specker theorem (its localized variant, to be exact) can be treated as the statement that a logic of those projection operators does not obey the principle of bivalence. This implies that such a logic has a gappy (partial) semantics or many-valued semantics.
Recommendations
- The quantum pigeonhole principle as a violation of the principle of bivalence
- Contextuality and truth-value assignment
- Contextual logic for quantum systems
- Topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem. I: Quantum states as generalized valuations
- Can many-valued logic help to comprehend quantum phenomena?
Cites work
- A variant of the Kochen-Specker theorem localising value indefiniteness
- Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: a proof with 18 vectors.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
- Quantum logic as partial infinite-valued Łukasiewicz logic
- Quantum physics, fuzzy sets and logic. Steps towards a many-valued interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Quantum supervaluationism
- Truth values of quantum phenomena
- Two simple proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Quantum contextuality implies a logic that does not obey the principle of bivalence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2329952)