Meta-inductive prediction based on attractivity weighting: mathematical and empirical performance evaluation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2332810
DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2018.12.006zbMATH Open1426.91077OpenAlexW2914556854MaRDI QIDQ2332810FDOQ2332810
Authors: Paul D. Thorn, Gerhard Schurz
Publication date: 5 November 2019
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.12.006
Recommendations
ecological rationalitytake-the-bestmeta-inductionattractivity weightingcue-based predictionregret weighting
Cites Work
- Prediction, Learning, and Games
- Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi-armed bandit problems
- Fast, frugal, and fit: simple heuristics for paired comparison
- Cumulative Dominance and Heuristic Performance in Binary Multiattribute Choice
- Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: some results on their relative accuracy
- Equilibrium play in large group market entry games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less ``more?
- ``Take-the-best and other simple strategies: why and when they work ``well with binary cues
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: Meta-inductive prediction based on attractivity weighting: mathematical and empirical performance evaluation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2332810)