Comment on: ``Solving many-body Schrödinger equations with kinetic energy partition method
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2334339
Abstract: We discuss a recent test of the performance of the kinetic energy partition method (KEP) through its application to two separable quantum-mechanical models. We argue that one of the benchmark models is exceedingly simple for testing any realistic approximate method and that almost any reasonable approach yields better results. In the second example our exact benchmark eigenvalues disagree considerably with those chosen by the authors for comparison, which casts doubts on the accuracy of their KEP approach.
Recommendations
- Solving many-body Schrödinger equations with kinetic energy partition method
- Comment on: ``The kinetic energy partition method applied to quantum eigenvalue problems with many harmonic-oscillator potentials by Y.-H. Chen and S. D. Chao
- Comment on: ``Split kinetic energy method for quantum systems with competing potentials
- The kinetic energy partition method applied to quantum eigenvalue problems with many harmonic-oscillator potentials
- Split kinetic energy method for quantum systems with competing potentials
Cites work
Cited in
(6)- Comment on: ``Split kinetic energy method for quantum systems with competing potentials
- Comment on: ``The kinetic energy partition method applied to quantum eigenvalue problems with many harmonic-oscillator potentials by Y.-H. Chen and S. D. Chao
- Solving many-body Schrödinger equations with kinetic energy partition method
- The kinetic energy partition method applied to quantum eigenvalue problems with many harmonic-oscillator potentials
- The Single-Particle Kinetic Energy of Many-Fermion Systems: Transcending the Thomas-Fermi plus Von Weizsäcker Method
- Split kinetic energy method for quantum systems with competing potentials
This page was built for publication: Comment on: ``Solving many-body Schrödinger equations with kinetic energy partition method
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2334339)