Set-reconstructibility of Post classes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2348047
Abstract: The clones of Boolean functions are classified in regard to set-reconstructibility via a strong dichotomy result: the clones containing only affine functions, conjunctions, disjunctions or constant functions are set-reconstructible, whereas the remaing clones are not weakly reconstructible.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A census of non-reconstructable digraphs. I: Six related families
- A family of non-reconstructible hypergraphs
- Almost every graph has reconstruction number three
- Essential arities of term operations in finite algebras
- Generalizations of Świerczkowski's lemma and the arity gap of finite functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3141308 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3334164 (Why is no real title available?)
- Hypomorphic Sperner systems and non-reconstructible functions
- More non-reconstructible hypergraphs
- On Reconstruction of Matrices
- RECONSTRUCTING MULTISETS OVER COMMUTATIVE GROUPOIDS AND AFFINE FUNCTIONS OVER NONASSOCIATIVE SEMIRINGS
- The solution to the partition reconstruction problem
- The Two-Valued Iterative Systems of Mathematical Logic. (AM-5)
- What is reconstruction for ordered sets?
Cited in
(6)- Hypomorphic Sperner systems and non-reconstructible functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 540524 (Why is no real title available?)
- Content and singletons bring unique identification minors
- On reconstructive sets of vertices in the Boolean cube
- Algebras, Graphs and Ordered Sets – ALGOS 2020 & the Mathematical Contributions of Maurice Pouzet
- Reconstructing permutations from identification minors
This page was built for publication: Set-reconstructibility of Post classes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2348047)