The incongruent correspondence: seven non-classical years of old quantum theory
DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2014.02.002zbMATH Open1315.81013OpenAlexW2094496133MaRDI QIDQ2351900FDOQ2351900
Authors: Shahin Kaveh 
Publication date: 26 June 2015
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.02.002
Recommendations
- Inconsistency of quantum-classical dynamics, and what it implies
- Practicing the correspondence principle in the old quantum theory. A transformation through implementation
- Classicality without decoherence: A reply to Schlosshauer
- Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
- Relating incompatibility, noncommutativity, uncertainty, and Kirkwood–Dirac nonclassicality
- Dynamical states and the conventionality of (non-) classicality
- Classicality, the ensemble interpretation, and decoherence: Resolving the hyperion dispute
- Practising the correspondence principle in the old quantum theory: Franck, Hund and the Ramsauer effect
- scientific article
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1163218
Physics (00A79) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) History of quantum theory (81-03)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- Correspondence principle versus Planck-type theory of the atom
- The Uncertain Limits Between Classical and Quantum Physics: Optical Dispersion and Bohr's Atomic Model
- The correspondence principle and the understanding of decoherence
- Correspondence as an intertheory relation
- Breakdown of Bohr's Correspondence Principle
This page was built for publication: The incongruent correspondence: seven non-classical years of old quantum theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2351900)
