When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2354681
Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying the worst point-symmetric shape for covering n-dimensional Euclidean space with lattice translates. Here we focus on the dimensions where the thinnest lattice covering with balls is known and ask whether the ball is a pessimum for covering in these dimensions compared to all point-symmetric convex shapes. We find that the ball is a local pessimum in 3 dimensions, but not so for 4 and 5 dimensions.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3869218 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 783365 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 863503 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3364397 (Why is no real title available?)
- A note on optimal unimodular lattices
- Computational approaches to lattice packing and covering problems
- Convex and Discrete Geometry
- Convolutions and multiplier transformations of convex bodies
- Extreme coverings ofn-space by spheres
- Inextensible domains
- Inhomogeneous extreme forms
- Reinhardt's problem of lattice packings of convex domains: Local extremality of the Reinhardt octagon
- The 3-ball is a local pessimum for packing
- Über die dichteste gitterförmige Lagerung kongruenter Bereiche in der Ebene und eine besondere Art konvexer Kurven
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2354681)