When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2354681

DOI10.1007/S00454-015-9690-1zbMATH Open1336.52023arXiv1301.5895OpenAlexW1743329823MaRDI QIDQ2354681FDOQ2354681


Authors: Yoav Kallus Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 July 2015

Published in: Discrete \& Computational Geometry (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying the worst point-symmetric shape for covering n-dimensional Euclidean space with lattice translates. Here we focus on the dimensions where the thinnest lattice covering with balls is known and ask whether the ball is a pessimum for covering in these dimensions compared to all point-symmetric convex shapes. We find that the ball is a local pessimum in 3 dimensions, but not so for 4 and 5 dimensions.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5895




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2354681)