When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2354681




Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying the worst point-symmetric shape for covering n-dimensional Euclidean space with lattice translates. Here we focus on the dimensions where the thinnest lattice covering with balls is known and ask whether the ball is a pessimum for covering in these dimensions compared to all point-symmetric convex shapes. We find that the ball is a local pessimum in 3 dimensions, but not so for 4 and 5 dimensions.









This page was built for publication: When is the ball a local pessimum for covering?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2354681)