Syndrome measurement strategies for the [[7,1,3]] code
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2355591
DOI10.1007/S11128-015-0988-YzbMATH Open1317.81070arXiv1505.07390OpenAlexW2019814987MaRDI QIDQ2355591FDOQ2355591
Authors: Yaakov S. Weinstein
Publication date: 24 July 2015
Published in: Quantum Information Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC) entails the encoding of quantum information into a QEC code space, measuring error syndromes to properly locate and identify errors, and, if necessary, applying a proper recovery operation. Here we compare three syndrome measurement protocols for the 7,1,3 QEC code: Shor states, Steane states, and one ancilla qubit by simulating the implementation of 50 logical gates with the syndrome measurements interspersed between the gates at different intervals. We then compare the fidelities for the different syndrome measurement types. Our simulations show that the optimal syndrome measurement strategy is generally not to apply syndrome measurements after every gate but depends on the details of the error environment. Our simulations also allow a quantum computer programmer to weigh computational accuracy versus resource consumption (time and number of qubits) for a particular error environment. In addition, we show that applying syndrome measurements that are unnecessary from the standpoint of quantum fault tolerance may be helpful in achieving better accuracy or in lowering resource consumption. Finally, our simulations demonstrate that the single-qubit non-fault tolerant syndrome measurement strategy achieves comparable fidelity to those that are fault tolerant.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07390
Recommendations
- [[:Publication:291572|Syndrome measurement order for the 7,1,3 quantum error correction code]]
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1933266
- Encoding an arbitrary state in a \([7, 1, 3]\) quantum error correction code
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2148772
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1498800
- A single asymmetric error-correcting code with 2/sup 13/ codewords of dimension 17
- [[:Publication:5696625|ERROR THRESHOLD ESTIMATION BY MEANS OF THE 7,1,3 CSS QUANTUM CODE]]
- Weight Spectrum of Codes Associated With the Grassmannian <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$G(3,7)$</tex></formula>
- Improved bounds for ternary linear codes of dimension 7
- Decoding the (73, 37, 13) quadratic residue code
Cites Work
- Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction
- Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 code
- Reliable quantum computers
- Encoding an arbitrary state in a \([7, 1, 3]\) quantum error correction code
- Practical Approximation of Single-Qubit Unitaries by Single-Qubit Quantum Clifford and T Circuits
- Volume thresholds for quantum fault tolerance
- The Solovay--Kitaev algorithm
- Generators and relations for \(n\)-qubit Clifford operators
Cited In (7)
- Fault-tolerant conversion between adjacent Reed–Muller quantum codes based on gauge fixing
- Improving ancilla states for quantum computation
- [[Publication:291572|Syndrome measurement order for the 7,1,3 quantum error correction code]]
- Fault-Tolerant Syndrome Extraction and Cat State Preparation with Fewer Qubits
- Encoding an arbitrary state in a \([7, 1, 3]\) quantum error correction code
- Quantum error correction using weak measurements
- An integrity measure to benchmark quantum error correcting memories
This page was built for publication: Syndrome measurement strategies for the \(7,1,3\) code
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2355591)