On the relation between two approaches to necessary optimality conditions in problems with state constraints

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2363563

DOI10.1007/S10957-017-1089-0zbMATH Open1370.49011arXiv1705.03930OpenAlexW2600032945MaRDI QIDQ2363563FDOQ2363563


Authors: Ivan Samylovskiy, Andrei Dmitruk Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 July 2017

Published in: Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider a class of optimal control problems with a state constraint and investigate a trajectory with a single boundary interval (subarc). Following R.V. Gamkrelidze, we differentiate the state constraint along the boundary subarc, thus reducing the original problem to a problem with mixed control-state constraints, and show that this way allows one to obtain the full system of stationarity conditions in the form of A.Ya. Dubovitskii and A.A. Milyutin, including the sign definiteness of the measure (state constraint multiplier), i.e., the nonnegativity of its density and atoms at junction points. The stationarity conditions are obtained by a two-stage variation approach, proposed in this paper. At the first stage, we consider only those variations, which do not affect the boundary interval, and obtain optimality conditions in the form of Gamkrelidze. At the second stage, the variations are concentrated on the boundary interval, thus making possible to specify the stationarity conditions and obtain the sign of density and atoms of the measure.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.03930




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: On the relation between two approaches to necessary optimality conditions in problems with state constraints

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2363563)