A tale of two Liouville closures

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2363586

DOI10.2140/PJM.2017.290.41zbMATH Open1387.12004arXiv1608.00997OpenAlexW3098667283MaRDI QIDQ2363586FDOQ2363586


Authors: Allen Gehret Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 July 2017

Published in: Pacific Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: An H-field is a type of ordered valued differential field with a natural interaction between ordering, valuation, and derivation. The main examples are Hardy fields and fields of transseries. Aschenbrenner and van den Dries proved in~cite{MZ} that every H-field K has either exactly one or exactly two Liouville closures up to isomorphism over K, but the precise dividing line between these two cases was unknown. We prove here that this dividing line is determined by uplambda-freeness, a property of H-fields that prevents certain deviant behavior. In particular, we show that under certain types of extensions related to adjoining integrals and exponential integrals, the property of uplambda-freeness is preserved. In the proofs we introduce a new technique for studying H-fields, the emph{yardstick argument} which involves the rate of growth of pseudoconvergence.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00997




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: A tale of two Liouville closures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2363586)