Proof mining with dependent types
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2364689
Abstract: Several approaches exist to data-mining big corpora of formal proofs. Some of these approaches are based on statistical machine learning, and some -- on theory exploration. However, most are developed for either untyped or simply-typed theorem provers. In this paper, we present a method that combines statistical data mining and theory exploration in order to analyse and automate proofs in dependently typed language of Coq.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Acyclic Preferences and Existence of Sequential Nash Equilibria: A Formal and Constructive Equivalence
- An introduction to small scale reflection in Coq
- ATP and presentation service for Mizar formalizations
- Computing persistent homology within Coq/SSReflect
- Conjecture synthesis for inductive theories
- Hipster: integrating theory exploration in a proof assistant
- Learning-assisted theorem proving with millions of lemmas
- Lemma Mining over HOL Light
- MaSh: machine learning for Sledgehammer
- Mining state-based models from proof corpora
- Pattern recognition and machine learning.
- Proof-pattern recognition and lemma discovery in ACL2
- Recycling proof patterns in Coq: case studies
- Rippling: Meta-Level Guidance for Mathematical Reasoning
- SEPIA: search for proofs using inferred automata
- Towards Algorithmic Cut-Introduction
Describes a project that uses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Proof mining with dependent types
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2364689)