A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2374576
DOI10.1016/J.SPL.2016.09.027zbMATH Open1463.62008arXiv1609.02688OpenAlexW2520697526MaRDI QIDQ2374576FDOQ2374576
Anne Ruiz-Gazen, Guillaume Chauvet
Publication date: 15 December 2016
Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We prove that any implementation of pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling. This property entails the weak consistency of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and the existence of a conservative variance estimator. A small simulation study supports our findings.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02688
sampling algorithmcube methodvariance estimatorwith-replacement samplingunequal probabilitiesmean-square consistency
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Spatially balanced sampling through the pivotal method
- A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
- Unequal probability sampling without replacement through a splitting method
- On a characterization of ordered pivotal sampling
- The BK inequality for pivotal sampling a.k.a. the Srinivasan sampling process
- A comparison of conditional Poisson sampling versus unequal probability sampling with replace\-ment
- On unequal probability sampling: Sufficient conditions for the superiority of sampling without replacement
- On the Theory of Sampling from Finite Populations
- A comparison of Sampford's sampling procedure versus unequal probability sampling with replacement
- Minimax solutions in sampling from finite populations
- Negative Dependence in Sampling
- Positive Influence and Negative Dependence
- Negative Dependence and Srinivasan's Sampling Process
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2374576)
