A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2374576

DOI10.1016/J.SPL.2016.09.027zbMATH Open1463.62008arXiv1609.02688OpenAlexW2520697526MaRDI QIDQ2374576FDOQ2374576


Authors: Guillaume Chauvet, Anne Ruiz-Gazen Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 15 December 2016

Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We prove that any implementation of pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling. This property entails the weak consistency of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and the existence of a conservative variance estimator. A small simulation study supports our findings.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02688




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2374576)