On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: user oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.059zbMath1168.90513OpenAlexW2048433053MaRDI QIDQ2384628
Philippe Lenca, Patrick Meyer, Benoît Vaillant, Stéphane Lallich
Publication date: 10 October 2007
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.059
Applications of statistics in engineering and industry; control charts (62P30) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)
Related Items (19)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: the TOMASO method
- Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys
- Modeling decisions for artificial intelligence. Third international conference, MDAI 2006, Tarragona, Spain, April 3--5, 2006. Proceedings.
- The GUHA method of automatic hypotheses determination
- Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Transl. from the French by Mark R. McCord
- Induction of Association Rules: Apriori Implementation
- Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method
- Discovery Science
- A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms
- Dynamic adaptation of rules bases under cognitive constaints.
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: On selecting interestingness measures for association rules: user oriented description and multiple criteria decision aid