Localization in infinite billiards: a comparison between quantum and classical ergodicity

DOI10.1023/B:JOSS.0000037218.05161.F3MaRDI QIDQ2385665zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Sandro Graffi, Marco Lenci

Publication date 12 October 2007

Published in Journal of Statistical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0306075

zbMATH Keywords

cuspsergodicitylocalizationnon-compact billiardsquantum chaosquantum ergodicity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum chaos (81Q50)

Abstract: Consider the non-compact billiard in the first quandrant bounded by the positive $x$-semiaxis, the positive $y$-semiaxis and the graph of $f(x)=(x+1{)}^{-alpha}$, $alphain(1,2]$. Although the Schnirelman Theorem holds, the quantum average of the position $x$ is finite on any eigenstate, while classical ergodicity entails that the classical time average of $x$ is unbounded.

Recommendations

• Note on converse quantum ergodicity
• Asymptotic rate of quantum ergodicity in chaotic Euclidean billiards
• Localization in billiards
• Ergodic billiards that are not quantum unique ergodic (with an appendix by Andrew Hassell and Luc Hillairet)
• Ergodicity of eigenfunctions for ergodic billiards

Cited in

(5)

• Localization in billiards
• Global versus Local Billiard Level Dynamics: The Limits of Universality
• Note on converse quantum ergodicity
• Ergodic billiards that are not quantum unique ergodic (with an appendix by Andrew Hassell and Luc Hillairet)
• Quantum leaks

This page was built for publication: Localization in infinite billiards: a comparison between quantum and classical ergodicity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2385665)