A Bayesian Mallows approach to nontransitive pair comparison data: how human are sounds?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2415475
Abstract: We are interested in learning how listeners perceive sounds as having human origins. An experiment was performed with a series of electronically synthesized sounds, and listeners were asked to compare them in pairs. We propose a Bayesian probabilistic method to learn individual preferences from non-transitive pairwise comparison data, as happens when one (or more) individual preferences in the data contradicts what is implied by the others. We build a Bayesian Mallows model in order to handle non-transitive data, with a latent layer of uncertainty which captures the generation of preference misreporting. We then develop a mixture extension of the Mallows model, able to learn individual preferences in a heterogeneous population. The results of our analysis of the musicology experiment are of interest to electroacoustic composers and sound designers, and to the audio industry in general, whose aim is to understand how computer generated sounds can be produced in order to sound more human.
Recommendations
- Bayesian reconstruction of sound localization cues from responses to random spectra
- Dynamic Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Analysis of Music
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3858228
- Learning midlevel auditory codes from natural sound statistics
- Bayesian semiparametric mixed effects Markov models with application to vocalization syntax
- An application of sparse measure valued Bayesian inversion to acoustic sound source identification
- Latent Features in Similarity Judgments: A Nonparametric Bayesian Approach
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: A Bayesian Mallows approach to nontransitive pair comparison data: how human are sounds?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2415475)