The champernowne constant is not Poissonian

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2422604

DOI10.7169/FACM/1749zbMATH Open1445.11075arXiv1710.09313OpenAlexW2964265185MaRDI QIDQ2422604FDOQ2422604


Authors: Wolfgang Stockinger, Gottlieb Pirsic Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 June 2019

Published in: Functiones et Approximatio. Commentarii Mathematici (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We say that a sequence (xn)ninmathbbN in [0,1) has Poissonian pair correlations if �egin{equation*} lim_{N o infty} frac{1}{N} # lbrace 1 leq l eq m leq N: | x_l - x_m | leq frac{s}{N} brace = 2s end{equation*} for every sgeq0. In this note we study the pair correlation statistics for the sequence of shifts of alpha, xn=lbrace2nalphabrace,n=1,2,3,ldots, where we choose alpha as the Champernowne constant in base 2. Throughout this article lbracecdotbrace denotes the fractional part of a real number. It is well known that (xn)ninmathbbN has Poissonian pair correlations for almost all normal numbers alpha (in the sense of Lebesgue), but we will show that it does not have this property for all normal numbers alpha, as it fails to be Poissonian for the Champernowne constant.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09313




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: The champernowne constant is not Poissonian

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2422604)