On the reasonable and unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in classical and quantum physics

DOI10.1007/s10701-010-9442-2zbMath1211.81014OpenAlexW2075537033MaRDI QIDQ2430436

Arkady Plotnitsky

Publication date: 6 April 2011

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9442-2

zbMATH Keywords

probabilityquantum mechanicsepistemologyclassical physicsmathematical formalismprediction vs. description

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Physics (00A79)

Related Items (5)

Space- and time-dependent scaling of numbers in mathematical structures: effects on physical and geometric quantities ⋮ Effects of a scalar scaling field on quantum mechanics ⋮ Non-Kolmogorovian approach to the context-dependent systems breaking the classical probability law ⋮ Fiber bundle description of number scaling in gauge theory and geometry ⋮ Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models

Cites Work

• Epistemology and probability. Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the nature of quantum-theoretical thinking
• The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Richard courant lecture in mathematical sciences delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: On the reasonable and unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in classical and quantum physics