Comparing semantics of logics for multi-agent systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2431875
A comparative analysis is offered of several logics that have been developed to deal with a set of agents taking actions, simultaneously or sequentially, on a common set of states, affecting transitions between states. The logics considered are coalitional game logic, alternating-time temporal logic and alternating-time temporal epistemic logic. Reduction and equivalence results are established for their semantics. Ways to transform between different types of models and languages are proved.
Recommendations
Cited in
(23)- Reasoning about temporal properties of rational play
- Dynamic coalition logic: granting and revoking dictatorial powers
- Bisimulations for verifying strategic abilities with an application to the ThreeBallot voting protocol
- Complete axiomatization and decidability of alternating-time temporal logic
- A SAT-based approach to unbounded model checking for alternating-time temporal epistemic logic
- Model checking abilities of agents: a closer look
- On the use (and abuse) of logic in game theory
- An alternating-time temporal logic with knowledge, perfect recall and past: axiomatisation and model-checking
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5129607 (Why is no real title available?)
- Model-Checking Strategic Ability and Knowledge of the Past of Communicating Coalitions
- A Logic for Reasoning about Rational Agents
- Constructive knowledge: what agents can achieve under imperfect information
- Temporal Aspects of the Dynamics of Knowledge
- The logic of joint ability in two-player tacit games
- AI*IA 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
- An abstraction-refinement framework for verifying strategic properties in multi-agent systems with imperfect information
- Preface to the special issue: Temporal logics of agency
- Reasoning about dependence, preference and coalitional power
- Seven kinds of equivalent models for generalized coalition logics
- Each of those eight coalition logics is also determined by four other kinds of models
- Reasoning about group responsibility for exceeding risk threshold in one-shot games
- Finitely defined preference and preference indiscernibility in ATL with strategy contexts
- Quantified temporal alethic boulesic doxastic logic
This page was built for publication: Comparing semantics of logics for multi-agent systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2431875)