The Balinski-Young comparison of divisor methods is transitive

DOI10.1007/S00355-006-0110-6MaRDI QIDQ2432508zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Luc Lauwers, Tom Van Puyenbroeck

Publication date 25 October 2006

Published in Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0110-6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12)

Recommendations

• A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation
• An application of a few inequalities among sequences in electoral systems
• Parametric vs. divisor methods of apportionment
• Relaxed divisor methods and their seat biases
• Thresholds of the divisor methods

Cites work

• A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1045885 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications
• Inequality reducing and inequality preserving transformations of incomes: Symmetric and individualistic transformations

Cited in

(3)

• Majorization comparison of closed list electoral systems through a matrix theorem
• “One Man, One Vote” Part 2: Measurement of Malapportionment and Disproportionality and the Lorenz Curve A: Introduction and Measurement Tools
• An application of a few inequalities among sequences in electoral systems

This page was built for publication: The Balinski-Young comparison of divisor methods is transitive

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2432508)