Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2436243
Recommendations
- Talking at cross-purposes: how Einstein and the logical empiricists never agreed on what they were disagreeing about
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1185937
- The forgotten tradition: how the logical empiricists missed the philosophical significance of the work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci
- Poincaré's conventionalism and the logical positivists
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6415525
Cited in
(7)- New perspectives on the hole argument
- `\dots But I still cant get rid of a sense of artificiality': the Reichenbach-Einstein debate on the geometrization of the electromagnetic field
- The plasticine ball argument. Hermann Weyl, the homogeneity of space and Mach's principle
- A case for Lorentzian relativity
- 'But one must not legalize the mentioned sin': phenomenological vs. dynamical treatments of rods and clocks in Einstein's thought
- Talking at cross-purposes: how Einstein and the logical empiricists never agreed on what they were disagreeing about
- Some philosophical prehistory of the (Earman-Norton) hole argument
This page was built for publication: Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2436243)