Same initial states attack in Yang et al.'s quantum private comparison protocol and the improvement
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2443984
Abstract: In Yang et al.'s literatures (J. Phys. A: Math. 42, 055305, 2009; J. Phys. A:Math. 43, 209801, 2010), a quantum private comparison protocol based on Bell states and hash function is proposed, which aims to securely compare the equality of two participants' information with the help of a dishonest third party (TP). However, this study will point out their protocol cannot resist a special kind of attack, TP's same initial states attack, which is presented in this paper. That is, the dishonest TP can disturb the comparison result without being detected through preparing the same initial states. Finally, a simple improvement is given to avoid the attack.
Recommendations
- Cryptanalysis and improvement of Ye et al's quantum private comparison protocol
- Cryptanalysis and improvement for the quantum private comparison protocol based on triplet entangled state and single-particle measurement
- Intercept-resend-measure attack towards quantum private comparison protocol using genuine four-particle entangled states and its improvement
- Cryptanalysis and improvement of quantum private comparison protocol based on Bell entangled states
- Improvement of multi-party quantum private comparison protocol using d-dimensional basis states without entanglement swapping
Cites work
- A protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with \(\chi \)-type state
- A quantum protocol for millionaire problem with Bell states
- An efficient two-party quantum private comparison protocol with decoy photons and two-photon entanglement
- Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states
- Cryptanalysis and melioration of secure quantum sealed-bid auction with post-confirmation
- Efficient quantum private comparison employing single photons and collective detection
- Experimental quantum teleportation
- New quantum private comparison protocol using -type state
- New quantum private comparison protocol using EPR pairs
- QUANTUM AUCTIONS
- Quantum private comparison based on GHZ entangled states
- Quantum private comparison protocol based on Bell entangled states
- Quantum private comparison protocol based on cluster states
- Quantum private comparison using genuine four-particle entangled states
- Quantum secret sharing
- Selection of unitary operations in quantum secret sharing without entanglement
Cited in
(16)- Statistics attack on ``quantum private comparison with a malicious third party and its improvement
- Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol secure against collusion attacks
- An efficient and secure arbitrary N-party quantum key agreement protocol using Bell states
- Quantum privacy-preserving price E-negotiation
- Improvement of measure-resend semi-quantum private comparison scheme using GHZ states
- Improvement of multi-party quantum private comparison protocol using d-dimensional basis states without entanglement swapping
- Cryptanalysis and improvement of Ye et al's quantum private comparison protocol
- An efficient quantum private query protocol based on oracle and Grover iteration
- Improved deterministic \(N\)-to-one joint remote preparation of an arbitrary qubit via EPR pairs
- Multiparty quantum sealed-bid auction using single photons as message carrier
- Secure quantum private comparison of equality based on asymmetric \(W\) state
- Deterministic joint remote preparation of arbitrary four-qubit cluster-type state using EPR pairs
- Deterministic joint remote preparation of a four-qubit cluster-type state via GHZ states
- Improvement on ``an efficient protocol for the quantum private comparison of equality with \(W\) state
- Multi-party semi-quantum key agreement with delegating quantum computation
- Intercept-resend-measure attack towards quantum private comparison protocol using genuine four-particle entangled states and its improvement
This page was built for publication: Same initial states attack in Yang et al.'s quantum private comparison protocol and the improvement
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2443984)