Does truth win when teams reason strategically?

DOI10.1016/J.ECONLET.2014.01.016MaRDI QIDQ2453023zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Timo Heinrich, Christoph Helbach, Jeannette E. Brosig-Koch

Publication date 6 June 2014

Published in Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.01.016

zbMATH Keywords

race gamestrategic reasoningteam decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Experimental studies (91A90) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• Minimax play by teams
• Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
• Strategic learning in teams
• A simple model of competition between teams
• Team competition and the public goods game

Cites work

• Are four heads better than two? An experimental beauty-contest game with teams of different size
• Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance
• Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis
• On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda

Cited in

(1)

• Multi-dimensional reasoning in competitive resource allocation games: evidence from intra-team communication

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

This page was built for publication: Does truth win when teams reason strategically?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2453023)