Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2453429
DOI10.1007/s00355-012-0687-xzbMath1288.91079OpenAlexW2123886426MaRDI QIDQ2453429
José Carlos Rodríguez Alcantud
Publication date: 6 June 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127269
Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32) Welfare economics (91B15)
Related Items (4)
Sufficientarianism ⋮ The Interplay Between Intergenerational Justice and Mathematical Utility Theory ⋮ Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: <scp>P</scp>areto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics ⋮ The indirect-utility criterion for ranking opportunity sets over time
Cites Work
- Sustainable recursive social welfare functions
- `Non-interference' implies equality
- Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams
- Resolving distributional conflicts between generations
- An axiomatic approach to sustainable development
- On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
- A complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams
- An axiomatic approach to intergenerational equity
- Treading a Fine Line: Characterisations and Impossibilities for Liberal Principles in Infinitely-Lived Societies
- Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle
This page was built for publication: Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?
