Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?

DOI10.1007/s00355-012-0687-xzbMath1288.91079OpenAlexW2123886426MaRDI QIDQ2453429

José Carlos Rodríguez Alcantud

Publication date: 6 June 2014

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10366/127269

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32) Welfare economics (91B15)

Related Items

Sufficientarianism, The Interplay Between Intergenerational Justice and Mathematical Utility Theory, Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: <scp>P</scp>areto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics, The indirect-utility criterion for ranking opportunity sets over time

Cites Work

• Sustainable recursive social welfare functions
• `Non-interference' implies equality
• Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams
• Resolving distributional conflicts between generations
• An axiomatic approach to sustainable development
• On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
• A complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams
• An axiomatic approach to intergenerational equity
• Treading a Fine Line: Characterisations and Impossibilities for Liberal Principles in Infinitely-Lived Societies
• Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle