Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2453429
Recommendations
- Treading a fine line: characterisations and impossibilities for liberal principles in infinitely-lived societies
- Ordering infinite utility streams: efficiency, continuity, and no impatience
- On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
- On the extension of the utilitarian and Suppes-Sen social welfare relations to infinite utility streams
- Ordering infinite utility streams
Cites work
- A complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams
- An axiomatic approach to intergenerational equity
- An axiomatic approach to sustainable development
- Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams
- Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle
- On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
- Resolving distributional conflicts between generations
- Sustainable recursive social welfare functions
- Treading a fine line: characterisations and impossibilities for liberal principles in infinitely-lived societies
- `Non-interference' implies equality
Cited in
(7)- Sufficientarianism
- On the impossibility of complete non-interference in Paretian social judgements
- Ordering infinite utility streams: efficiency, continuity, and no impatience
- The interplay between intergenerational justice and mathematical utility theory
- The indirect-utility criterion for ranking opportunity sets over time
- Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto efficient and egalitarian axiomatics
- Haves and have-nots: a theory of economic sufficientarianism
This page was built for publication: Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2453429)