Is Weibull's modulus really a material constant? Example case with interacting collinear cracks

DOI10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2005.08.002MaRDI QIDQ2456083zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors E. Valenza, Luciano Afferrante, M. Ciavarella

Publication date 17 October 2007

Published in International Journal of Solids and Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.08.002

zbMATH Keywords

brittle fractureSize effectWeibull theory

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Brittle fracture (74R10)

Recommendations

• Statistical strength of brittle materials with strongly interacting collinear microcracks
• A new statistical distribution function for fracture toughness
• The cumulative stress hazard density as an alternative to the Weibull model
• Statistical Failure Prediction Models for Brittle Materials.
• Statistical characterization of meso-scale uniaxial compressive strength in brittle materials with randomly occurring flaws

Cited in

(6)

• Statistical characterization of meso-scale uniaxial compressive strength in brittle materials with randomly occurring flaws
• Probabilistic approach and size effect in brittle materials under multiaxial stress states
• A new statistical distribution function for fracture toughness
• Maximum likelihood estimation for three-parameter Weibull distribution using evolutionary strategy
• Is Weibull distribution the correct model for predicting probability of failure initiated by non-interacting flaws?
• Estimation of strengths in large annealed glass panels

This page was built for publication: Is Weibull's modulus really a material constant? Example case with interacting collinear cracks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2456083)