Dual versus primal-dual interior-point methods for linear and conic programming
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2467157
DOI10.1007/S10107-006-0067-3zbMATH Open1163.90797OpenAlexW2069972878MaRDI QIDQ2467157FDOQ2467157
Publication date: 21 January 2008
Published in: Mathematical Programming. Series A. Series B (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1813/9285
Interior-point methods (90C51) Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.) (90C08)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Solving semidefinite-quadratic-linear programs using SDPT3
- Solving Large-Scale Sparse Semidefinite Programs for Combinatorial Optimization
- A polynomial-time algorithm, based on Newton's method, for linear programming
- Barrier Functions in Interior Point Methods
- Path-Following Methods for Linear Programming
- An implementation of Karmarkar's algorithm for linear programming
- An $O(\sqrt{n} L)$-Iteration Large-Step Primal-Dual Affine Algorithm for Linear Programming
Cited In (2)
Uses Software
Recommendations
- Infeasible-start primal-dual methods and infeasibility detectors for nonlinear programming problems π π
- Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods for Self-Scaled Cones π π
- Detecting infeasibility in infeasible-interior-point methods for optimization π π
- Title not available (Why is that?) π π
- Title not available (Why is that?) π π
This page was built for publication: Dual versus primal-dual interior-point methods for linear and conic programming
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2467157)