Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: why they often make no sense

DOI10.1016/J.MCM.2007.03.016MaRDI QIDQ2472686zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Rozann Whitaker

Publication date 22 February 2008

Published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.016

zbMATH Keywords

affine transformationalternativesBarzilaicriteriahierarchic structuremultilinear formpriorities

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Group preferences (91B10)

Recommendations

• Another potential shortcoming of AHP
• Remarks on the Dyer-Saaty controversy
• Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: fallacy of the popular methods
• A note on the paper ``Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: fallacy of the popular methods
• A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP

Cites work

• Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary
• On the decomposition of value functions

Cited in

(9)

• Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process
• A multi-objective supplier selection framework based on user-preferences
• The primitive cognitive network process: comparisons with the analytic hierarchy process
• Deriving priority vector from pairwise comparisons matrix with fuzzy elements
• Deriving priority vector from pairwise comparisons matrix with fuzzy elements by solving optimization problem
• Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry
• A new algorithm for computing priority vector of pairwise comparisons matrix with fuzzy elements
• The deck of cards method to build interpretable fuzzy sets in decision-making
• Another potential shortcoming of AHP

This page was built for publication: Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: why they often make no sense

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2472686)