About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2478092
DOI10.1016/J.CRME.2007.08.004zbMath1211.76065OpenAlexW2099091496WikidataQ30051534 ScholiaQ30051534MaRDI QIDQ2478092
Publication date: 14 March 2008
Published in: Comptes Rendus. Mécanique. Académie des Sciences, Paris (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2007.08.004
Related Items (17)
An entropy-stable discontinuous Galerkin approximation of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for the compressible Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations ⋮ Dynamic models for large eddy simulation of compressible flows with a high order DG method ⋮ Predictive RANS simulations via Bayesian model-scenario averaging ⋮ Fluid particle dynamics and the non-local origin of the Reynolds shear stress ⋮ A new non-linear RANS model with enhanced near-wall treatment of turbulence anisotropy ⋮ A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship ⋮ Magnetohydrodynamic flows: Boussinesq conjecture ⋮ Comparison of different data-assimilation approaches to augment RANS turbulence models ⋮ A consistent stochastic large-scale representation of the Navier-Stokes equations ⋮ Use of Lagrangian statistics for the analysis of the scale separation hypothesis in turbulent channel flow ⋮ Turbulence anisotropy effects on corner-flow separation: physics and turbulence modelling ⋮ A framework to develop data-driven turbulence models for flows with organised unsteadiness ⋮ Scaling laws in turbulence ⋮ A-posteriori LES assessment of subgrid-scale closures for bounded passive scalars ⋮ Turbulence modelling analysis in a corner separation flow ⋮ Algorithms and models for turbulence not at statistical equilibrium ⋮ Efficient assimilation of sparse data into RANS-based turbulent flow simulations using a discrete adjoint method
This page was built for publication: About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity
