A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2006.04.001zbMATH Open1136.03300OpenAlexW2007829700MaRDI QIDQ2480967FDOQ2480967

Martin Caminada

Publication date: 7 April 2008

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2006.04.001

Recommendations

• Arguments, proofs, and dialogues
• Socratic trees
• Preferred semantics as Socratic discussion
• Socratic proofs
• A proof theorical framework for argumentation modeling

zbMATH Keywords

inferenceargumentationdialogue

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• How to reason defeasibly
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Abstract argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A logic for default reasoning
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
• Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument

Cited In (1)

• Socratic proofs

Uses Software

• OSCAR

This page was built for publication: A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2480967)