A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation

DOI10.1016/j.jal.2006.04.001zbMath1136.03300OpenAlexW2007829700MaRDI QIDQ2480967

Martin Caminada

Publication date: 7 April 2008

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2006.04.001

zbMATH Keywords

inferencedialogueargumentation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Uses Software

• OSCAR

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A logic for default reasoning
• How to reason defeasibly
• Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Abstract argumentation systems
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

This page was built for publication: A formal account of Socratic-style argumentation