On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2482974
DOI10.1214/07-AOAS143zbMATH Open1144.62027arXiv0803.3757OpenAlexW2047354426MaRDI QIDQ2482974FDOQ2482974
Authors: David Freedman 
Publication date: 30 April 2008
Published in: The Annals of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Regression adjustments are often made to experimental data. Since randomization does not justify the models, bias is likely; nor are the usual variance calculations to be trusted. Here, we evaluate regression adjustments using Neyman's nonparametric model. Previous results are generalized, and more intuitive proofs are given. A bias term is isolated, and conditions are given for unbiased estimation in finite samples.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3757
Recommendations
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining Freedman's critique
- Revisiting regression adjustment in experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects
- Is regression adjustment supported by the Neyman model for causal inference?
- Bias of the regression estimator for experiments using clustered random assignment
Nonparametric regression and quantile regression (62G08) Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics (62E20) Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12)
Cites Work
- A Combinatorial Central Limit Theorem
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Statistical Models: Theory and Practice
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- A Note on Weighted Randomization
- Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India
- Limits of Sequences of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups
Cited In (40)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Randomization-based test for censored outcomes: a new look at the logrank test
- Randomization-based causal inference from split-plot designs
- Regression adjustment for treatment effect with multicollinearity in high dimensions
- Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining Freedman's critique
- Using standard tools from finite population sampling to improve causal inference for complex experiments
- Regression analysis of experiments with complex confounding patterns guided by the alias matrix.
- Covariance adjustment in radomized experiments and observational studies
- On equivalencies between design-based and regression-based variance estimators for randomized experiments
- A causal bootstrap
- Inverse Probability Weighting Estimation in Completely Randomized Experiments
- Sharp bounds on the variance in randomized experiments
- Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials
- Front-door versus back-door adjustment with unmeasured confounding: bias formulas for front-door and hybrid adjustments with application to a job training program
- The Perils of Balance Testing in Experimental Design: Messy Analyses of Clean Data
- Regression-based multiple treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization
- Bias of the regression estimator for experiments using clustered random assignment
- Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments
- Statistical inference of heterogeneous treatment effect based on single-index model
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- The Generalized Oaxaca-Blinder Estimator
- Leveraging population outcomes to improve the generalization of experimental results: application to the JTPA study
- From Local to Global: External Validity in a Fertility Natural Experiment
- Sampling‐based Randomised Designs for Causal Inference under the Potential Outcomes Framework
- A Design-Based Perspective on Synthetic Control Methods
- Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials with missing covariate and outcome data
- Rematching on-the-fly: sequential matched randomization and a case for covariate-adjusted randomization
- Regression-assisted inference for the average treatment effect in paired experiments
- Covariate adjustment in randomization-based causal inference for \(2^K\) factorial designs
- Regression-adjusted estimation of quantile treatment effects under covariate-adaptive randomizations
- A unified analysis of regression adjustment in randomized experiments
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with a diverging number of covariates
- Inference after covariate-adaptive randomisation: aspects of methodology and theory
- Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimates in stratified randomized experiments
- Toward Better Practice of Covariate Adjustment in Analyzing Randomized Clinical Trials
- Rejoinder on ‘Inference after covariate-adaptive randomization: aspects of methodology and theory’
- More powerful multiple testing in randomized experiments with non-compliance
- Revisiting regression adjustment in experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects
This page was built for publication: On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2482974)
