Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. II.

DOI10.1016/J.APAL.2005.11.007MaRDI QIDQ2503395zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, Menachem Magidor

Publication date 14 September 2006

Published in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2005.11.007

zbMATH Keywords

approachable ordinalcovering propertiesgood ordinalinternally approachable structuremutual stationarityPCF theoryprecipitous idealsquare sequencestationary reflectionthe ideal \(I[\lambda \)]tight structure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04) Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55)

Recommendations

• On singular stationarity. I: Mutual stationarity and ideal-based methods
• Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. I
• On the relationship between mutual and tight stationarity
• On the strength of mutual stationarity
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1548922

Cites work

• A very weak square principle
• Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. I
• Chang's conjecture for _
• Collapsing successors of singulars
• Descriptive set theory
• Games played on Boolean algebras
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3954894 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3762044 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3336797 (Why is no real title available?)
• Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis
• Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
• Mutually stationary sequences of sets and the non-saturation of the non-stationary ideal on \(P_x(\lambda)\)
• On the size of closed unbounded sets
• Separating stationary reflection principles
• Splitting Strongly Almost Disjoint Families
• Squares, scales and stationary reflection
• The non-compactness of square
• The two-cardinals transfer property and resurrection of supercompactness 󠀼span style=󠀢color:red󠀢󠀾This article has been retracted󠀼/span󠀾
• When Does Almost Free Imply Free? (For Groups, Transversals, etc.)

Cited in

(29)

• Organic and tight
• Lower consistency bounds for mutual stationarity with divergent uncountable cofinalities
• On a problem of Foreman and Magidor
• Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. I
• Some results on the nonstationary ideal
• On the relationship between mutual and tight stationarity
• On singular stationarity. I: Mutual stationarity and ideal-based methods
• More rigid ideals
• Tight stationarity and tree-like scales
• Canonical form of Tarski sets in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory
• Combinatorial properties and dependent choice in symmetric extensions based on Lévy collapse
• Forcing closed unbounded subsets of \(\aleph_{\omega_{1}+1}\)
• Namba forcing and no good scale
• The tree property and the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at \(\aleph _{\omega ^{2}}\)
• Diagonal Prikry extensions
• Forcing a mutual stationarity property in cofinality 𝜔₁
• The PCF conjecture and large cardinals
• Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis
• ON SINGULAR STATIONARITY II (TIGHT STATIONARITY AND EXTENDERS-BASED METHODS)
• A new Löwenheim-Skolem theorem
• Good and bad points in scales
• The tree property at \(\aleph _{\omega +1}\)
• Remarks on Gitik's model and symmetric extensions on products of the Lévy collapse
• Lower consistency bounds for mutual stationarity with divergent cofinalities and limited covering
• Global square and mutual stationarity at the \(\aleph_n\)
• Good points for scales (and more)
• The _2-potentialist principle
• Continuous tree-like scales
• Mutual stationarity and singular Jonsson cardinals

This page was built for publication: Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. II.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2503395)