Why delayed choice experiments do not imply retrocausality

DOI10.1007/s40509-014-0026-2zbMath1319.81008OpenAlexW2006460737WikidataQ61645834 ScholiaQ61645834MaRDI QIDQ2516518

David P. Ellerman

Publication date: 3 August 2015

Published in: Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-014-0026-2

zbMATH Keywords

retrocausalitydelayed choice experimentsquantum eraser experiments

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P45)

Related Items (5)

Demystifying the delayed-choice quantum eraser ⋮ Delayed-choice quantum erasers and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox ⋮ The delayed-choice quantum eraser leaves no choice ⋮ The `delayed choice quantum eraser' neither erases nor delays ⋮ Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Why delayed choice experiments do not imply retrocausality