A tight upper bound on the number of cyclically adjacent transpositions to sort a permutation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2630342
Abstract: We consider the problem of upper bounding the number of circular transpositions needed to sort a permutation. It is well known that any permutation can be sorted using at most adjacent transpositions. We show that, if we allow all adjacent transpositions, as well as the transposition that interchanges the element in position 1 with the element in the last position, then the number of transpositions needed is at most . This answers an open question posed by Feng, Chitturi and Sudborough (2010).
Recommendations
- Improved upper bound for sorting permutations by prefix transpositions
- Upper bounds for sorting permutations with a transposition tree
- Tighter upper bound for sorting permutations with prefix transpositions
- A new upper bound for sorting permutations with prefix transpositions
- Lower bounding edit distances between permutations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1054728 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1557065 (Why is no real title available?)
- A group-theoretic model for symmetric interconnection networks
- Circular permutations and genome shuffling
- Combinatorics of genome rearrangements.
- Sorting with fixed-length reversals
- Symmetry in interconnection networks based on Cayley graphs of permutation groups: A survey
- The complexity of finding minimum-length generator sequences
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: A tight upper bound on the number of cyclically adjacent transpositions to sort a permutation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2630342)