Prudence, temperance, edginess, and risk apportionment as decreasing sensitivity to detrimental changes

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.06.005zbMath1232.91217MaRDI QIDQ2638310

Béatrice Rey, Michel M. Denuit

Publication date: 15 September 2010

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.06.005

zbMATH Keywords

supermodularity; expected utility; stochastic dominance; wealth effect

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B16: Utility theory

Related Items

Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments, Another look at risk apportionment, Risk apportionment and multiply monotone targets, Health and portfolio choices: a diffidence approach, Decreasing higher-order absolute risk aversion and higher-degree stochastic dominance, The monetary utility premium and interpersonal comparisons

Cites Work

• Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science
• Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance
• Inequalities for distributions with given marginals
• Extremal generators and extremal distributions for the continuous \(s\)-convex stochastic orderings
• Mixed risk aversion
• Saving under rank-dependent utility
• Proper prudence, standard prudence and precautionary vulnerability
• The safest dependence structure among risks.
• Higher-order generalizations of Arrow-Pratt and Ross risk aversion: a comparative statics approach
• Degree of downside risk aversion and self-protection
• The s-convex orders among real random variables, with applications
• Risk Vulnerability and the Tempering Effect of Background Risk