A discussion on particle number and quantum indistinguishability

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2643676

DOI10.1007/S10701-007-9129-5zbMATH Open1120.81054arXiv0705.3417OpenAlexW2062425561MaRDI QIDQ2643676FDOQ2643676


Authors: G. Domenech, F. Holik Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 August 2007

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The concept of individuality in quantum mechanics shows radical differences from the concept of individuality in classical physics, as E. Schroedinger pointed out in the early steps of the theory. Regarding this fact, some authors suggested that quantum mechanics does not possess its own language, and therefore, quantum indistinguishability is not incorporated in the theory from the beginning. Nevertheless, it is possible to represent the idea of quantum indistinguishability with a first order language using quasiset theory (Q). In this work, we show that Q cannot capture one of the most important features of quantum non individuality, which is the fact that there are quantum systems for which particle number is not well defined. An axiomatic variant of Q, in which quasicardinal is not a primitive concept (for a kind of quasisets called finite quasisets), is also given. This result encourages the searching of theories in which the quasicardinal, being a secondary concept, stands undefined for some quasisets, besides showing explicitly that in a set theory about collections of truly indistinguishable entities, the quasicardinal needs not necessarily be a primitive concept.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3417




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (20)





This page was built for publication: A discussion on particle number and quantum indistinguishability

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2643676)