Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2655679



Abstract: The effects of several nonlinear regularization techniques are discussed in the framework of 3D seismic tomography. Traditional, linear, ell2 penalties are compared to so-called sparsity promoting ell1 and ell0 penalties, and a total variation penalty. Which of these algorithms is judged optimal depends on the specific requirements of the scientific experiment. If the correct reproduction of model amplitudes is important, classical damping towards a smooth model using an ell2 norm works almost as well as minimizing the total variation but is much more efficient. If gradients (edges of anomalies) should be resolved with a minimum of distortion, we prefer ell1 damping of Daubechies-4 wavelet coefficients. It has the additional advantage of yielding a noiseless reconstruction, contrary to simple ell2 minimization (`Tikhonov regularization') which should be avoided. In some of our examples, the ell0 method produced notable artifacts. In addition we show how nonlinear ell1 methods for finding sparse models can be competitive in speed with the widely used ell2 methods, certainly under noisy conditions, so that there is no need to shun ell1 penalizations.




Cites work



Describes a project that uses

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2655679)