A local interpretation of quantum mechanics

From MaRDI portal
Publication:266258

DOI10.1007/S10701-015-9976-4zbMATH Open1336.81015arXiv1504.06800OpenAlexW1588997495MaRDI QIDQ266258FDOQ266258

Carlos Lopez

Publication date: 13 April 2016

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: It is shown that Quantum Mechanics is ambiguous when predicting relative frequencies for an entangled system if the measurements of both subsystems are performed in spatially separated events. This ambiguity gives way to unphysical consequences: the projection rule could be applied in one or the other temporal(?) order of measurements (being non local in any case), but symmetry of the roles of both subsystems would be broken. An alternative theory is presented in which this ambiguity does not exist. Observable relative frequencies differ from those of orthodox Quantum Mechanics, and a {it gendaken} experiment is proposed to falsify one or the other theory. In the alternative theory, each subsystem has an individual state in its own Hilbert space, and the total system state is direct product (rank one) of both, so there is no entanglement. Correlation between subsystems appears through a hidden label that prescribes the output of arbitrary hypothetical measurements. Measurement is treated as a usual reversible interaction, and this postulate allows to determine relative frequencies when the value of a magnitude is known without in any way perturbing the system, by measurement of the correlated companion. It is predicted the existence of an accompanying system, the de Broglie wave, introduced in order to preserve the action reaction principle in indirect measurements, when there is no interaction of detector and particle. Some action on the detector, different from the one cause by a particle, should be observable.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.06800





Cites Work


Cited In (6)






This page was built for publication: A local interpretation of quantum mechanics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q266258)