What independent random utility representations are equivalent to the IIA assumption?

DOI10.1007/s11238-014-9479-3zbMath1378.91087OpenAlexW2052367719MaRDI QIDQ266527

John K. Dagsvik

Publication date: 13 April 2016

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-014-9479-3

zbMATH Keywords

independence from irrelevant alternativesindependent random utility modelsnon-separable random utility representations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Related Items (1)

A note on a recent paper by Dagsvik on IIA and random utilities

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Some results on random utility models
• The stochastic choice problem: A game-theoretic approach
• The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thurstone's theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution
• A representation theorem for finite random scale systems
• A short proof of a theorem of Falmagne.
• How large is the class of generalized extreme value random utility models?
• Falmagne and the Rationalizability of Stochastic Choices in Terms of Random Orderings
• Discrete and Continuous Choice, Max-Stable Processes, and Independence from Irrelevant Attributes

This page was built for publication: What independent random utility representations are equivalent to the IIA assumption?