Universality vs genericity and C₄-free graphs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2674563
Abstract: We show that the existence of a universal structure implies the existence of a generic structure for any approximable class of countable structures. We also show that the converse is not true. As a consequence, we provide several new examples of weak Fra"iss'e classes of finite graphs. Finally, we show that the class of all countable -free graphs does not contain a generic structure, strengthening a result of A. Hajnal and J. Pach.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3902684 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 722611 (Why is no real title available?)
- A course in model theory
- Bowtie-free graphs have a Ramsey lift
- Coherent extension of partial automorphisms, free amalgamation and automorphism groups
- Countable Ultrahomogeneous Undirected Graphs
- Examples of weak amalgamation classes
- Games with finitely generated structures
- Generic expansions of ω-categorical structures and semantics of generalized quantifiers
- Geodetic graphs of diameter two
- On strongly regular graphs with \(\mu =1\)
- Some remarks on universal graphs
- Some remarks on universal graphs
- Some universal graphs
- There is no universal countable pentagon‐free graph
- Turbulence, amalgamation, and generic automorphisms of homogeneous structures
- Universal elements and the complexity of certain classes of infinite graphs
- Universal graphs and universal functions
- Universal graphs with a forbidden near‐path or 2‐bouquet
- Universal graphs with forbidden subgraphs and algebraic closure
- Weak saturation and weak amalgamation property
Cited in
(6)
This page was built for publication: Universality vs genericity and \(C_4\)-free graphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2674563)