Metainferences from a proof-theoretic perspective, and a hierarchy of validity predicates
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2679576
Recommendations
Cites work
- A fully classical truth theory characterized by substructural means
- A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics
- An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
- Classical logic and the strict tolerant hierarchy
- Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth
- Equivalence of consequence operations
- External curries
- Faithfulness for naive validity
- MULTIPLE-CONCLUSION LP AND DEFAULT CLASSICALITY
- ST, LP and tolerant metainferences
- Simple consequence relations
- The logic of paradox
- The logics of strict-tolerant logic
Cited in
(8)- On the metainferential solution to the semantic paradoxes
- Inferences and metainferences in \(\mathsf{ST}\)
- Anti-exceptionalism, truth and the BA-plan
- Metainferential reasoning on strong Kleene models
- A Priori Advantages of Meta-Induction and the No Free Lunch Theorem: A Contradiction?
- Invited Talk: On a (Quite) Universal Theorem Proving Approach and Its Application in Metaphysics
- Higher-level inferences in the strong-Kleene setting: a proof-theoretic approach
- A hybrid calculus for the validities and invalidities of classical propositional logic
This page was built for publication: Metainferences from a proof-theoretic perspective, and a hierarchy of validity predicates
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2679576)