Are the open-ended rules for negation categorical?

DOI10.1007/S11229-019-02519-9MaRDI QIDQ2695402zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Constantin C. Brîncuș

Publication date 31 March 2023

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02519-9

zbMATH Keywords

categoricitylogical constantsnon-normal modelsopen-endedness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Other nonclassical logic (03B60)

Recommendations

• On negation: Pure local rules
• A non-deterministic view on non-classical negations
• Expressive power and incompleteness of propositional logics
• Negation in the light of modal logic
• Empirical negation, co-negation and contraposition rule. I: Semantical investigations

Cites work

• `Everything'
• Compositionality solves Carnap's problem
• Der Aussagenkalkül und die Topologie
• Foundations of logical consequence
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3987256 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3591947 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3099236 (Why is no real title available?)
• Note on truth-tables
• Rejection
• Speech acts, categoricity, and the meanings of logical connectives
• The connectives
• What's so logical about the logical axioms?

Cited in

(3)

• Categorical quantification
• Inferential quantification and the -rule
• Carnap's (categoricity) problem

This page was built for publication: Are the open-ended rules for negation categorical?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2695402)