On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_8OpenAlexW3206106791MaRDI QIDQ2695512FDOQ2695512

Vivien Beuselinck, Srdjan Vesic, Jérôme Delobelle

Publication date: 31 March 2023

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_8

zbMATH Keywords

abstract argumentationgradual semanticsself-attack

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Logic in computer science (03B70)

Cites Work

• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
• Equilibrium states in numerical argumentation networks
• A Parametrized Ranking-Based Semantics for Persuasion
• A Principle-Based Analysis of Weakly Admissible Semantics

This page was built for publication: On restricting the impact of self-attacking arguments in gradual semantics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2695512)